Sunday, October 28, 2007

The Latest Controversy

Well.... the silver doe promised a post on the latest controversy surrounding Dumbledore,; but hasn't done so... probably because she vanished ( Whether it was Lily or Snape who cast her initially is still under speculation !). So its up to Fawkes once again to come to the rescue, or this blog will become redundant like so many others.

In my opinion, Dumbledore isnt gay. Not that I have anything against it, but just that it sounds a little out of place with the story. When I read the book, it came across to me as that Dumbledore, being brilliant, needed some like-minded company; especially after the tradegies that struck his family. Someone with such a brilliant mind would obviously feel trapped in those circumsatnces, since he was saddled with the responsibilty of taking care of the family. Dumbledore being Dumbledore, the thought of deserting his family for his personal goals would have been appalling; but none-the-less, he would have felt let-down after what he had seen for his future and what he was left with ultimately. So it only stands to reason that when he met Grindelwald, he must have seen it as a chance to live his dreams; if not in person,then by discussing them with his new-found, equally brilliant friend.

But I dont think this means that he "fell in love "; to put it sooo eloquently (ahem !) with Grindelwald. Just because we meet someone like-minded and become really good friends and discuss plans together doesnt mean that they're in love. The thought doesnt come across as very real or even expected. Suffice to say, the thought didnt fall into place like others stated by Mrs.Rowling. It didnt click with the facts provided in the book.

Do I hear anyone seconding the motion ??

12 howlers and owlers:

fawkes said...

Homenum revelio !

Anonymous said...

I think its funny how knee-jerk everyone is about it....

Anonymous said...

no... not knee jerk.... but wats ur opinion on the subject ?

the silver doe said...

I second the motion! I do I do!
And btw, it was LILY who 'cast' me, awright?

Anonymous said...

i absolutely agree...
Dumbledore definitely offered a perspective to the readers and he did speak for Rowling (as she herself admitted in an interview). To the question: “Does Dumbledore speak for you? JKR is said to have replied: “ Oh yes, very much so. Dumbledore often speaks for me”. I wonder why JKR gave a gay twist to this character, long after the book series has been completed! Is this a joke or political correctness? Worse, In stirring up the controversy she has only stripped Dumbledore’s of his credibility to speak (within the story) to a larger audience.
I dont like it...not at all!!!!

Anonymous said...

i absolutely agree wid u i mean...
gosh...sounded controversial!@.@

fawkes said...

@silver doe : r u sure it was lily who cast u ?

@prachi : thanx !

the silver doe said...

yep

fawkes said...

ohhhhk ! though im not tooo convincd as yet !

The Keeper of the Keys said...

no it wasnt lily u morons it was snape ...i like snape....

and i'm not a homophobe (i'm not a homo either, for that matter), and honestly, it doenst matter......

i mean it did stick out a bit ant him being gay...like it was uncalled for.....

anyway, at least she didnt write it in the books...

the silver doe said...

"atleast she din write it in the books?" Does that make it worse? I can't decide...

The Keeper of the Keys said...

yeah the publishers wud have never let her publish that....kids wud have been asking questions , too..

"Magical Template" designed by Blogger Buster